Back to AI Research Assistants leaderboard

Entity Page · Category · AI Research Assistants

Elicit AI Visibility in AI Research Assistants

Elicit ranks #1 in the AI Research Assistants leaderboard with a 92.6 AI Index across 6 engines. Its strongest current signal comes from Grok, and the score should be read as AI visibility rather than product quality, adoption, revenue, or market share.

Entity Score
93
Leaderboard rank #1 of 19
Category Rank
#1
Engines Covered
6
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
Apr 28, 2026

Entity Snapshot

Elicit is currently #1 out of 19 entities in AI Research Assistants, with a 92.6 overall AI visibility score across 6 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering category comparison and recommendation prompts.

Elicit is currently #1 out of 19 AI Research Assistants entities, with a 92.6 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Elicit leads Scite by 2.8 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from Grok, where Elicit records a 94.9 AI Index and 95% mention rate. DeepSeek is the next strongest covered engine at 94.5 with a 96% mention rate.

The softer engine-level signal is MiniMax, where Elicit records a 88.8 AI Index and 89% mention rate. ChatGPT is another engine to watch at 91 with a 92% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Elicit in AI Research Assistants category prompts. It does not rank product quality, security, reliability, compliance, sales, or real-world usage.

Elicit's strongest current visibility comes from Grok (94.9 AI Index, 95% mention rate) and DeepSeek (94.5 AI Index, 96% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is MiniMax (88.8 AI Index, 89% mention rate) and ChatGPT (91.1 AI Index, 92% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Elicit or a competitor set.

Compare in Trend Explorer

Elicit has limited historical movement in the current public payload. Use the latest AI Index, engine coverage, and mention-rate signals as the primary read until more completed runs are available.

Elicit has limited historical data so far. More runs will make the trend more reliable.

Elicit has limited historical data so far. More runs will make the trend more reliable.

Engine Breakdown

ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#1
AI Index
91.0
Mention Rate
92.0%
gemini
gemini
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#1
AI Index
93.2
Mention Rate
94.0%
Grok
Grok
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#1
AI Index
94.9
Mention Rate
95.0%
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#1
AI Index
94.5
Mention Rate
96.0%
MiniMax
MiniMax
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#2
AI Index
88.8
Mention Rate
89.0%
Kimi
Kimi
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#1
AI Index
93.4
Mention Rate
95.0%

Comparable Entities

Scite is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Elicit ahead of it by 2.8 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is Elicit ranked in the AI Research Assistants leaderboard?

Elicit is included because tracked AI engines surface it in AI Research Assistants prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for Elicit?

The strongest current signal is Grok at 94.9 AI Index and 95% mention rate. The softest covered signal is MiniMax at 88.8 AI Index and 89% mention rate.

Which entities should be compared with Elicit?

The most useful nearby comparison is Scite. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.

How often is this page updated?

This page updates when a new completed AI Research Assistants leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-04-28.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 6 tracked AI engines and the latest completed category leaderboard run for AI Research Assistants.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.