AI Visibility Leaderboard
Txyz.ai AI Visibility in AI Research Assistants
Elicit is the current #1 entity in AI Research Assistants, with a 92.6 AI Index and 93.5% mention rate. Within this public leaderboard snapshot, it is the clearest benchmark for how tracked AI systems answer AI Research Assistants comparison prompts. Scite ranks #2 and trails Elicit by 2.8 AI Index points. That gap is the first number to check when deciding whether the top of the category is leader-dominated or closely contested. Semantic Scholar ranks #3 and completes the current podium. Comparing the top three across individual engine tabs helps separate broad recommendation consistency from single-engine strength. The latest public snapshot refreshed on 2026-04-28, covering 8 engines and 19 entities. Freshness matters because AI recommendations can shift as models, retrieval sources, prompts, and category evidence change.
Rank, score, engine coverage, and nearby competitors are rendered from the same accepted leaderboard data used by the public page.
Txyz.ai visibility profile
- Current rank
- 16
- Visibility score
- 79.83
- Collection
- AI Research Assistants
Use the engine tabs to compare how ChatGPT, gemini, Grok, and Claude rank brands differently. Some engines reward category authority while others emphasize popularity or recommendation style, so individual rankings can diverge from the overall leaderboard.
Closest competitors
| Brand | Rank | Visibility score | AI engine note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elicit | 1 | 91.19 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Semantic Scholar | 2 | 89.51 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Scite | 3 | 88.45 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| SciSpace | 4 | 88.12 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Scopus AI | 5 | 87.54 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| ResearchRabbit | 6 | 86.87 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Consensus | 7 | 86.78 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Web of Science Research Assistant | 8 | 86.34 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Iris.ai Researcher Workspace | 9 | 85.81 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Undermind | 10 | 84.96 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
How to read this page
This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.
Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.