AI Visibility Leaderboard
Bannerflow AI Visibility in AI Ad Creative Tools
Celtra is the current #1 entity in AI Ad Creative Tools, with a 91.7 AI Index and 91.3% mention rate. Within this public leaderboard snapshot, it is the clearest benchmark for how tracked AI systems answer AI Ad Creative Tools comparison prompts. AdCreative.ai ranks #2 and trails Celtra by 1.5 AI Index points. That gap is the first number to check when deciding whether the top of the category is leader-dominated or closely contested. Bannerflow ranks #3 and completes the current podium. Comparing the top three across individual engine tabs helps separate broad recommendation consistency from single-engine strength. The latest public snapshot refreshed on 2026-04-28, covering 8 engines and 18 entities. Freshness matters because AI recommendations can shift as models, retrieval sources, prompts, and category evidence change.
Rank, score, engine coverage, and nearby competitors are rendered from the same accepted leaderboard data used by the public page.
Bannerflow visibility profile
- Current rank
- 8
- Visibility score
- 86.31
- Collection
- AI Ad Creative Tools
Use the engine tabs to compare how ChatGPT, gemini, Grok, and Claude rank brands differently. Some engines reward category authority while others emphasize popularity or recommendation style, so individual rankings can diverge from the overall leaderboard.
Closest competitors
| Brand | Rank | Visibility score | AI engine note |
|---|---|---|---|
| AdCreative.ai | 1 | 89.67 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Celtra | 2 | 88.97 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Omneky | 3 | 87.93 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Pencil | 4 | 87.01 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Creatopy | 5 | 86.55 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Storyteq | 6 | 86.51 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Waymark | 7 | 86.5 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Arcads | 9 | 85.4 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Rocketium | 10 | 85.23 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Predis.ai | 11 | 84.6 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
How to read this page
This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.
Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.