AI Visibility Leaderboard
Tabby AI Visibility in AI Coding Agent
AI Coding Agent is a public AI visibility leaderboard for AI coding agents. It helps searchers compare which products AI systems mention, rank, and recommend when answering AI coding assistant, agentic coding, developer workflow, benchmark, and AI answer-engine comparison prompts. The ranking should be read together with engine coverage, mention-rate signals, rank gaps, and the latest completed runs. A high rank means the product is visible in tracked AI answers; it does not by itself prove product quality, market share, pricing fit, or customer satisfaction. For SEO and AEO review, this page now makes the AI coding agent benchmark and AI coding assistant rankings intent explicit: compare public ranking evidence first, then use a private AI visibility tracker when you need monitored prompts, owned brands, competitors, and recurring alerting.
Rank, score, engine coverage, and nearby competitors are rendered from the same accepted leaderboard data used by the public page.
Tabby visibility profile
- Current rank
- 12
- Visibility score
- 74.92
- Collection
- AI Coding Agent
Engine tabs show how tracked AI systems differ when answering AI Coding Agent prompts. Some engines emphasize widely known products; others respond more strongly to workflow fit, cited context, or category-specific wording. Use the engine view to separate broad AI visibility from single-engine strength. If one product ranks well overall but is weak in a specific engine, that gap is often more actionable than the overall rank alone.
Closest competitors
| Brand | Rank | Visibility score | AI engine note |
|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub Copilot | 1 | 89.55 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Claude Code | 2 | 89.29 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Cursor | 3 | 89.25 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Windsurf | 4 | 85.89 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Augment | 5 | 82.67 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| OpenAI Codex | 6 | 79.1 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Trae | 7 | 78.3 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Amazon Q Developer | 8 | 77.26 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Refact.ai | 9 | 76.45 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| JetBrains AI Assistant | 10 | 76.28 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
How to read this page
This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.
Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.