Back to AI Document Q&A Tools leaderboard

Entity Page · Category · AI Document Q&A Tools

Sharly AI Visibility in AI Document Q&A Tools

Sharly ranks #6 in the AI Document Q&A Tools leaderboard with a 82.7 AI Index across 6 engines. Its strongest current signal comes from gemini, and the score should be read as AI visibility rather than product quality, adoption, revenue, or market share.

Entity Score
83
Leaderboard rank #6 of 19
Category Rank
#6
Engines Covered
6
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
Apr 28, 2026

Entity Snapshot

Sharly is currently #6 out of 19 entities in AI Document Q&A Tools, with a 82.7 overall AI visibility score across 6 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering category comparison and recommendation prompts.

Sharly is currently #6 out of 20 AI Document Q&A Tools entities, with a 82.7 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Sharly trails ChatPDF by 3.3 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from gemini, where Sharly records a 84.5 AI Index and 85% mention rate. Kimi is the next strongest covered engine at 83.7 with a 83% mention rate.

The softer engine-level signal is MiniMax, where Sharly records a 81.3 AI Index and 81% mention rate. ChatGPT is another engine to watch at 81.8 with a 82% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Sharly in AI Document Q&A Tools category prompts. It does not rank product quality, security, reliability, compliance, sales, or real-world usage.

Sharly's strongest current visibility comes from gemini (84.6 AI Index, 85% mention rate) and Kimi (83.7 AI Index, 83% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is MiniMax (81.3 AI Index, 81% mention rate) and ChatGPT (81.8 AI Index, 82% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Sharly or a competitor set.

Compare in Trend Explorer

Sharly has limited historical movement in the current public payload. Use the latest AI Index, engine coverage, and mention-rate signals as the primary read until more completed runs are available.

Sharly has limited historical data so far. More runs will make the trend more reliable.

Sharly has limited historical data so far. More runs will make the trend more reliable.

Engine Breakdown

ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#6
AI Index
81.8
Mention Rate
82.0%
gemini
gemini
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#7
AI Index
84.5
Mention Rate
85.0%
Grok
Grok
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#7
AI Index
82.3
Mention Rate
82.0%
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#6
AI Index
82.8
Mention Rate
82.0%
MiniMax
MiniMax
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#6
AI Index
81.3
Mention Rate
81.0%
Kimi
Kimi
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#7
AI Index
83.7
Mention Rate
83.0%

Comparable Entities

ChatPDF is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Sharly behind it by 3.3 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is Sharly ranked in the AI Document Q&A Tools leaderboard?

Sharly is included because tracked AI engines surface it in AI Document Q&A Tools prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for Sharly?

The strongest current signal is gemini at 84.5 AI Index and 85% mention rate. The softest covered signal is MiniMax at 81.3 AI Index and 81% mention rate.

Which entities should be compared with Sharly?

The most useful nearby comparison is ChatPDF. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.

How often is this page updated?

This page updates when a new completed AI Document Q&A Tools leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-04-28.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 6 tracked AI engines and the latest completed category leaderboard run for AI Document Q&A Tools.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.