Back to AI Search Engines leaderboard

Entity Page · Category · AI Search Engines

ThinkAny AI Visibility in AI Search Engines

ThinkAny ranks #9 in the AI Search Engines leaderboard with a 70.8 AI Index across 5 engines. Its strongest current signal comes from gemini, and the score should be read as AI visibility rather than product quality, adoption, revenue, or market share.

Entity Score
71
Leaderboard rank #9 of 18
Category Rank
#9
Engines Covered
5
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
Apr 28, 2026

Entity Snapshot

ThinkAny is currently #9 out of 18 entities in AI Search Engines, with a 70.8 overall AI visibility score across 5 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering category comparison and recommendation prompts.

ThinkAny is currently #9 out of 18 AI Search Engines entities, with a 70.8 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. ThinkAny leads Andi by 0 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from gemini, where ThinkAny records a 78.1 AI Index and 77% mention rate. Grok is the next strongest covered engine at 72.6 with a 72% mention rate.

The softer engine-level signal is DeepSeek, where ThinkAny records a 65.9 AI Index and 65% mention rate. ChatGPT is another engine to watch at 66.3 with a 67% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface ThinkAny in AI Search Engines category prompts. It does not rank product quality, security, reliability, compliance, sales, or real-world usage.

ThinkAny's strongest current visibility comes from gemini (78.1 AI Index, 77% mention rate) and Grok (72.6 AI Index, 72% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is DeepSeek (65.9 AI Index, 65% mention rate) and ChatGPT (66.3 AI Index, 67% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for ThinkAny or a competitor set.

Compare in Trend Explorer

ThinkAny has limited historical movement in the current public payload. Use the latest AI Index, engine coverage, and mention-rate signals as the primary read until more completed runs are available.

ThinkAny has limited historical data so far. More runs will make the trend more reliable.

ThinkAny has limited historical data so far. More runs will make the trend more reliable.

Engine Breakdown

ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#9
AI Index
66.3
Mention Rate
67.0%
gemini
gemini
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#10
AI Index
78.1
Mention Rate
77.0%
Grok
Grok
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#10
AI Index
72.6
Mention Rate
72.0%
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#10
AI Index
65.9
Mention Rate
65.0%
Kimi
Kimi
Apr 28, 2026
Rank
#10
AI Index
71.3
Mention Rate
71.0%

Comparable Entities

Andi is the closest comparable entity by rank, with ThinkAny behind it by 0 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is ThinkAny ranked in the AI Search Engines leaderboard?

ThinkAny is included because tracked AI engines surface it in AI Search Engines prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for ThinkAny?

The strongest current signal is gemini at 78.1 AI Index and 77% mention rate. The softest covered signal is DeepSeek at 65.9 AI Index and 65% mention rate.

Which entities should be compared with ThinkAny?

The most useful nearby comparison is Andi. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.

How often is this page updated?

This page updates when a new completed AI Search Engines leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-04-28.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 5 tracked AI engines and the latest completed category leaderboard run for AI Search Engines.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.