AI Visibility Leaderboard
Cleaning Appliances AI Brand Rankings
Cleaning Appliances publishes 29 ranked brands from the accepted leaderboard snapshot. Dyson is rank 1 with composite index 83.3.
Brand rankings
| Rank | Brand | Visibility score | AI engine summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dyson | 83.3 | Rank 1 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 83.3; mention rate 91.07 |
| 2 | Miele | 69.69 | Rank 2 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 69.69; mention rate 76.79 |
| 3 | Shark | 59.58 | Rank 3 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 59.58; mention rate 76.79 |
| 4 | Bissell | 43.45 | Rank 4 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 43.45; mention rate 46.43 |
| 5 | iRobot | 40.7 | Rank 5 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 40.7; mention rate 39.29 |
| 6 | Bosch | 37.28 | Rank 6 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 37.28; mention rate 46.43 |
| 7 | Kärcher | 36.49 | Rank 7 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 36.49; mention rate 40.82 |
| 8 | Roborock | 35.14 | Rank 8 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 35.14; mention rate 24.49 |
| 9 | Tineco | 29.94 | Rank 9 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 29.94; mention rate 24.49 |
| 10 | Samsung | 26.86 | Rank 10 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 26.86; mention rate 8.93 |
| 11 | LG | 21.68 | Rank 11 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 21.68; mention rate 3.57 |
| 12 | Ecovacs | 21.57 | Rank 12 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 21.57; mention rate 0 |
| 13 | Electrolux | 20.09 | Rank 13 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 20.09; mention rate 14.29 |
| 14 | Dreame | 17.2 | Rank 14 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 17.2; mention rate 0 |
| 15 | Eureka | 16.53 | Rank 15 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 16.53; mention rate 2.04 |
| 16 | Hoover | 16.48 | Rank 16 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 16.48; mention rate 7.15 |
| 17 | Xiaomi | 15.8 | Rank 17 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 15.8; mention rate 0 |
| 18 | Philips | 13.5 | Rank 18 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 13.5; mention rate 0 |
| 19 | Eufy | 13.14 | Rank 19 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 13.14; mention rate 2.86 |
| 20 | Black+Decker | 11.14 | Rank 20 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 11.14; mention rate 0 |
| 21 | Dirt Devil | 9.8 | Rank 21 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 9.8; mention rate 0 |
| 22 | Vorwerk | 9.5 | Rank 22 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 9.5; mention rate 0 |
| 23 | Rainbow | 9.5 | Rank 23 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 9.5; mention rate 0 |
| 24 | Proscenic | 7.5 | Rank 24 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 7.5; mention rate 0 |
| 25 | Vax | 7 | Rank 25 in Cleaning Appliances with composite index 7; mention rate 0 |
Methodology FAQ
How is the Cleaning Appliances leaderboard calculated?
Overall ranking combines the latest AI visibility signals across tracked engines for Cleaning Appliances, including rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate patterns.
Why can Dyson lead overall but differ by engine?
Each AI engine can prefer different brands, evidence, freshness, and recommendation patterns, so engine-specific rankings can diverge from the combined leaderboard.
How often is this Cleaning Appliances leaderboard updated?
This leaderboard updates whenever new completed runs are available for Cleaning Appliances, with the latest refresh date shown on the page.
How to read this page
This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.
Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.