AI Visibility Leaderboard
Coffee Chains AI Brand Rankings
Coffee Chains publishes 24 ranked brands from the accepted leaderboard snapshot. Starbucks is rank 1 with composite index 89.46.
Brand rankings
| Rank | Brand | Visibility score | AI engine summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Starbucks | 89.46 | Rank 1 in Coffee Chains with composite index 89.46; mention rate 91.07 |
| 2 | Luckin Coffee | 58.61 | Rank 2 in Coffee Chains with composite index 58.61; mention rate 59.18 |
| 3 | Blue Bottle Coffee | 50.14 | Rank 3 in Coffee Chains with composite index 50.14; mention rate 62.5 |
| 4 | Peet's Coffee | 41.86 | Rank 4 in Coffee Chains with composite index 41.86; mention rate 46.43 |
| 5 | Tim Hortons | 41.32 | Rank 5 in Coffee Chains with composite index 41.32; mention rate 33.93 |
| 6 | Dunkin' | 37.24 | Rank 6 in Coffee Chains with composite index 37.24; mention rate 35.71 |
| 7 | Costa Coffee | 36.14 | Rank 7 in Coffee Chains with composite index 36.14; mention rate 17.86 |
| 8 | Dutch Bros Coffee | 35.02 | Rank 8 in Coffee Chains with composite index 35.02; mention rate 33.33 |
| 9 | % Arabica | 33.21 | Rank 9 in Coffee Chains with composite index 33.21; mention rate 50 |
| 10 | Manner Coffee | 30.51 | Rank 10 in Coffee Chains with composite index 30.51; mention rate 54.29 |
| 11 | Cotti Coffee | 29.41 | Rank 11 in Coffee Chains with composite index 29.41; mention rate 21.43 |
| 12 | McCafé | 26.38 | Rank 12 in Coffee Chains with composite index 26.38; mention rate 0 |
| 13 | Caribou Coffee | 24.69 | Rank 13 in Coffee Chains with composite index 24.69; mention rate 8.16 |
| 14 | Café Amazon | 22 | Rank 14 in Coffee Chains with composite index 22; mention rate 0 |
| 15 | The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf | 21.63 | Rank 15 in Coffee Chains with composite index 21.63; mention rate 4.08 |
| 16 | Gloria Jean's Coffees | 18.67 | Rank 16 in Coffee Chains with composite index 18.67; mention rate 0 |
| 17 | Cafe Coffee Day | 17.18 | Rank 17 in Coffee Chains with composite index 17.18; mention rate 3.57 |
| 18 | Caffè Nero | 16.8 | Rank 18 in Coffee Chains with composite index 16.8; mention rate 0 |
| 19 | Pret A Manger | 15.5 | Rank 19 in Coffee Chains with composite index 15.5; mention rate 0 |
| 20 | Second Cup Coffee Co. | 14.5 | Rank 20 in Coffee Chains with composite index 14.5; mention rate 0 |
| 21 | Segafredo Zanetti Espresso | 13 | Rank 21 in Coffee Chains with composite index 13; mention rate 0 |
| 22 | Ediya Coffee | 11 | Rank 22 in Coffee Chains with composite index 11; mention rate 0 |
| 23 | Doutor Coffee | 10.5 | Rank 23 in Coffee Chains with composite index 10.5; mention rate 0 |
| 24 | Pacific Coffee | 5.71 | Rank 24 in Coffee Chains with composite index 5.71; mention rate 14.29 |
Methodology FAQ
How is the Coffee Chains leaderboard calculated?
Overall ranking combines the latest AI visibility signals across tracked engines for Coffee Chains, including rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate patterns.
Why can Starbucks lead overall but differ by engine?
Each AI engine can prefer different brands, evidence, freshness, and recommendation patterns, so engine-specific rankings can diverge from the combined leaderboard.
How often is this Coffee Chains leaderboard updated?
This leaderboard updates whenever new completed runs are available for Coffee Chains, with the latest refresh date shown on the page.
How to read this page
This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.
Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.