AI Visibility Profile · Industry · Dairy

Activia AI Visibility in Dairy

Activia ranks #18 of 29 in the Dairy AI visibility leaderboard with a 15.9 AI Index across 3 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.

Entity Score
16
Leaderboard rank #18 of 29

AI visibility answer

How Activia appears in AI search

Activia currently ranks #18 out of 29 in the Dairy AI visibility leaderboard with a 15.9 AI Index across 3 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for Activia AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.

The engine breakdown compares how Grok, ChatGPT, and Claude rank or mention Activia, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.

Industry Rank
#18
Engines Covered
3
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
Jun 10, 2026

Entity Snapshot

Activia is currently #18 out of 29 entities in Dairy, with a 15.9 overall AI visibility score across 3 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering industry comparison and recommendation prompts.

Activia is currently #25 out of 30 tracked Dairy entities, with a 7 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Activia trails Meiji by 0.9 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from Grok, where Activia records a 13 AI Index and 0% mention rate. ChatGPT is the next strongest covered engine at 1 with a 0% mention rate.

The softer engine-level signal is ChatGPT, where Activia records a 1 AI Index and 0% mention rate. Grok is another engine to watch at 13 with a 0% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Activia in Dairy prompts. It does not rank product quality, sales, safety, or real-world market share.

Activia's strongest current visibility comes from Grok (28 AI Index, 0% mention rate) and Claude (14 AI Index, 0% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is ChatGPT (5.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate) and Claude (14 AI Index, 0% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.

Next Step

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Activia or a competitor set.

Activia ranking history

Activia's latest visible AI Index is 7. Read the trend together with engine coverage and mention-rate signals rather than as a standalone forecast. That movement is useful context, but it is strongest when it lines up with engine coverage and mention-rate changes. A single score move should not be read as a full market or product signal.

Trend data will appear after more completed runs are collected.

Engine Breakdown

Rank
#6
AI Index
28.0
Mention Rate
0.0%
Rank
#14
AI Index
5.7
Mention Rate
14.3%
Rank
#10
AI Index
14.0
Mention Rate
0.0%

Comparable Entities

Yoplait is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Activia behind it by 1.2 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is Activia ranked in the Dairy leaderboard?

Activia is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Dairy prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for Activia?

The strongest current signal is Grok at 13 AI Index and 0% mention rate. The softest covered signal is ChatGPT at 1 AI Index and 0% mention rate.

Which entities should be compared with Activia?

The most useful nearby comparison is Meiji. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.

How often is this page updated?

This page updates when a new completed Dairy leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-05-09.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 3 tracked AI engines and the latest completed industry leaderboard run for Dairy.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.