AI Visibility Profile · Industry · E-commerce
Adobe Commerce AI Visibility in E-commerce
Adobe Commerce ranks #15 of 30 in the E-commerce AI visibility leaderboard with a 17 AI Index across 6 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.
AI visibility answer
How Adobe Commerce appears in AI search
Adobe Commerce currently ranks #15 out of 30 in the E-commerce AI visibility leaderboard with a 17 AI Index across 6 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for Adobe Commerce AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.
The engine breakdown compares how Qwen, Grok, and ChatGPT rank or mention Adobe Commerce, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.
Entity Snapshot
Adobe Commerce is currently #15 out of 30 entities in E-commerce, with a 17 overall AI visibility score across 6 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering industry comparison and recommendation prompts.
Adobe Commerce is currently #13 out of 30 tracked E-commerce entities, with a 15.1 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Adobe Commerce trails Mercado Shops by 2.1 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from Grok, where Adobe Commerce records a 28 AI Index and 0% mention rate. Qwen is the next strongest covered engine at 11.4 with a 28.6% mention rate.
The softer engine-level signal is Kimi, where Adobe Commerce records a 5.7 AI Index and 14.3% mention rate. Qwen is another engine to watch at 11.4 with a 28.6% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Adobe Commerce in E-commerce prompts. It does not rank product quality, sales, safety, or real-world market share.
Adobe Commerce's strongest current visibility comes from Grok (29.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate) and DeepSeek (24 AI Index, 0% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is Kimi (2 AI Index, 0% mention rate) and Qwen (5.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.
Next Step
Continue from Here
This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Adobe Commerce or a competitor set.
Entity Trend
Adobe Commerce AI visibility trendAdobe Commerce's latest visible AI Index is 15.1. Read the trend together with engine coverage and mention-rate signals rather than as a standalone forecast. That movement is useful context, but it is strongest when it lines up with engine coverage and mention-rate changes. A single score move should not be read as a full market or product signal.
Engine Breakdown
Comparable Entities
commercetools is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Adobe Commerce behind it by 1 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.
FAQ
Why is Adobe Commerce ranked in the E-commerce leaderboard?
Adobe Commerce is included because tracked AI engines surface it in E-commerce prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.
Which engines are strongest and weakest for Adobe Commerce?
The strongest current signal is Grok at 28 AI Index and 0% mention rate. The softest covered signal is Kimi at 5.7 AI Index and 14.3% mention rate.
Which entities should be compared with Adobe Commerce?
The most useful nearby comparison is Mercado Shops. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.
How often is this page updated?
This page updates when a new completed E-commerce leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-05-10.
Methodology and source context
AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 6 tracked AI engines and the latest completed industry leaderboard run for E-commerce.
Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.