Back to Food Delivery leaderboard

Entity Page · Industry · Food Delivery

HungerStation AI Visibility in Food Delivery

HungerStation ranks #25 in the Food Delivery leaderboard with a 7.7 AI Index across 3 engines with current brand-level data. Its strongest current signal comes from Kimi, and the score should be read as AI visibility rather than market share or product quality.

Entity Score
2
Leaderboard rank #28 of 30
Industry Rank
#28
Engines Covered
1
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
May 31, 2026

Entity Snapshot

HungerStation is currently #28 out of 30 entities in Food Delivery, with a 2 overall AI visibility score across 1 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering industry comparison and recommendation prompts.

HungerStation is currently #25 out of 30 tracked Food Delivery entities, with a 7.7 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. HungerStation trails ShopeeFood by 0.3 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from Kimi, where HungerStation records a 10 AI Index and 0% mention rate. gemini is the next strongest covered engine at 7 with a 0% mention rate.

The softer engine-level signal is ChatGPT, where HungerStation records a 6 AI Index and 0% mention rate. gemini is another engine to watch at 7 with a 0% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface HungerStation in Food Delivery prompts. It does not rank product quality, sales, safety, or real-world market share.

HungerStation's current engine-level visibility is concentrated in gemini (2 AI Index, 0% mention rate). More completed engine coverage will make the strength and weakness pattern clearer.

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for HungerStation or a competitor set.

Compare in Trend Explorer

HungerStation's latest visible AI Index is 7.7. Read the trend together with engine coverage and mention-rate signals rather than as a standalone forecast. That movement is useful context, but it is strongest when it lines up with engine coverage and mention-rate changes. A single score move should not be read as a full market or product signal.

HungerStation softened over the visible trend window, moving from 6.5 on 2026-05-02 to 2 on 2026-05-31. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.

HungerStation softened over the visible trend window, moving from 6.5 on 2026-05-02 to 2 on 2026-05-31. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.

Engine Breakdown

gemini
gemini
May 31, 2026
Rank
#22
AI Index
2.0
Mention Rate
0.0%

Comparable Entities

Mr D is the closest comparable entity by rank, with HungerStation ahead of it by 0 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is HungerStation ranked in the Food Delivery leaderboard?

HungerStation is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Food Delivery prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for HungerStation?

The strongest current signal is Kimi at 10 AI Index and 0% mention rate. The softest covered signal is ChatGPT at 6 AI Index and 0% mention rate.

Which entities should be compared with HungerStation?

The most useful nearby comparison is ShopeeFood. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.

How often is this page updated?

This page updates when a new completed Food Delivery leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-05-10.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 1 tracked AI engines and the latest completed industry leaderboard run for Food Delivery.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.