AI Visibility Leaderboard
Hotel Booking Platforms AI Brand Rankings
Booking.com is the current #1 entity in Hotel Booking Platforms, with a 95.4 AI Index and 95.2% mention rate. Within this public leaderboard snapshot, it is the clearest benchmark for how tracked AI systems answer Hotel Booking Platforms comparison prompts. Expedia ranks #2 and trails Booking.com by 4.1 AI Index points. That gap is the first number to check when deciding whether the top of the category is leader-dominated or closely contested. Agoda ranks #3 and completes the current podium. Comparing the top three across individual engine tabs helps separate broad recommendation consistency from single-engine strength. The latest public snapshot refreshed on 2026-05-06, covering 8 engines and 23 entities. Freshness matters because AI recommendations can shift as models, retrieval sources, prompts, and category evidence change.
Hotel Booking Platforms tracks which products are most consistently surfaced by AI answer engines in this category. In the latest public snapshot, Booking.com, Expedia, and Agoda lead the overall ranking across 8 engines. The overall AI Index combines ranking strength and mention-rate signals. Booking.com ranks #1 with a 95.4 AI Index and 95.2% mention rate, leading Expedia by 4.1 points. Use the engine tabs to see where that position comes from. The overall view shows the combined category ranking, while engine-level views show whether a product is broadly visible or depends on strength in only a few answer systems.
The overall ranking gives a fast read on which products AI systems currently surface most often for Hotel Booking Platforms prompts. The engine tabs add the important detail: they show where visibility is broad, uneven, or concentrated in one answer system. Rank alone is not enough. Mention rate, score gaps, refresh date, and engine-level outliers help show whether a product's position looks durable or depends on a narrower set of prompts and engines. Read this page as AI visibility evidence, not as a product-quality, compliance, safety, or market-share ranking.
Hotel Booking Platforms publishes 23 ranked brands from the accepted leaderboard snapshot. Booking.com is rank 1 with composite index 94.12.
Brand rankings
| Rank | Brand | Visibility score | AI engine summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Booking.com | 94.12 | Rank 1 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 94.12; mention rate 94.14 |
| 2 | Expedia | 90.29 | Rank 2 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 90.29; mention rate 90.29 |
| 3 | Agoda | 88.65 | Rank 3 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 88.65; mention rate 88.57 |
| 4 | Trip.com | 87.78 | Rank 4 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 87.78; mention rate 87.71 |
| 5 | Hotels.com | 87.36 | Rank 5 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 87.36; mention rate 87 |
| 6 | Priceline | 84.27 | Rank 6 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 84.27; mention rate 84.14 |
| 7 | MakeMyTrip | 84.09 | Rank 7 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 84.09; mention rate 83.86 |
| 8 | Traveloka | 83.87 | Rank 8 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 83.87; mention rate 83.43 |
| 9 | Orbitz | 83.64 | Rank 9 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 83.64; mention rate 83.2 |
| 10 | Despegar | 82.57 | Rank 10 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 82.57; mention rate 82.4 |
| 11 | Rakuten Travel | 81.48 | Rank 11 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 81.48; mention rate 81 |
| 12 | HRS | 81.4 | Rank 12 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 81.4; mention rate 80.8 |
| 13 | Fliggy | 80.41 | Rank 13 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 80.41; mention rate 80.2 |
| 14 | HotelTonight | 80.36 | Rank 14 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 80.36; mention rate 79.4 |
| 15 | Hotwire | 80.13 | Rank 15 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 80.13; mention rate 79.71 |
| 16 | Cleartrip | 80.04 | Rank 16 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 80.04; mention rate 79.6 |
| 17 | Hopper | 79.78 | Rank 17 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 79.78; mention rate 79.43 |
| 18 | Lastminute.com | 79.78 | Rank 18 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 79.78; mention rate 79.6 |
| 19 | Wotif | 78.81 | Rank 19 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 78.81; mention rate 78.2 |
| 20 | Yatra | 78.42 | Rank 20 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 78.42; mention rate 78 |
| 21 | Ostrovok | 77.31 | Rank 21 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 77.31; mention rate 77 |
| 22 | Logitravel | 76.46 | Rank 22 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 76.46; mention rate 76 |
| 23 | Tablet Hotels | 75.95 | Rank 23 in Hotel Booking Platforms with composite index 75.95; mention rate 74.8 |
Methodology FAQ
How is the Hotel Booking Platforms leaderboard calculated?
Overall ranking combines the latest AI visibility signals across tracked engines for Hotel Booking Platforms, including rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate patterns.
Why can the current leader lead overall but differ by engine?
Each AI engine can prefer different brands, evidence, freshness, and recommendation patterns, so engine-specific rankings can diverge from the combined leaderboard.
How often is this Hotel Booking Platforms leaderboard updated?
This leaderboard updates whenever new completed runs are available for Hotel Booking Platforms, with the latest refresh date shown on the page.
How to read this page
This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.
Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.