Back to Job Platforms leaderboard

Entity Page · Category · Job Platforms

FlexJobs AI Visibility in Job Platforms

FlexJobs ranks #7 in the Job Platforms leaderboard with a 82 AI Index across 6 engines. Its strongest current signal comes from gemini, and the score should be read as AI visibility rather than product quality, adoption, revenue, or market share.

Entity Score
82
Leaderboard rank #7 of 21
Category Rank
#7
Engines Covered
6
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
May 6, 2026

Entity Snapshot

FlexJobs is currently #7 out of 21 entities in Job Platforms, with a 82 overall AI visibility score across 6 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering category comparison and recommendation prompts.

FlexJobs is currently #7 out of 21 Job Platforms entities, with a 82 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. FlexJobs trails Zhaopin by 1.5 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from gemini, where FlexJobs records a 86 AI Index and 85% mention rate. MiniMax is the next strongest covered engine at 84 with a 83% mention rate.

The softer engine-level signal is Grok, where FlexJobs records a 77 AI Index and 75% mention rate. Kimi is another engine to watch at 80.8 with a 79% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface FlexJobs in Job Platforms category prompts. It does not rank product quality, security, reliability, compliance, sales, or real-world usage.

FlexJobs's strongest current visibility comes from gemini (86.1 AI Index, 85% mention rate) and MiniMax (84 AI Index, 83% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is Grok (77.1 AI Index, 75% mention rate) and Kimi (80.8 AI Index, 79% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for FlexJobs or a competitor set.

Compare in Trend Explorer

FlexJobs has limited historical movement in the current public payload. Use the latest AI Index, engine coverage, and mention-rate signals as the primary read until more completed runs are available.

FlexJobs has limited historical data so far. More runs will make the trend more reliable.

FlexJobs has limited historical data so far. More runs will make the trend more reliable.

Engine Breakdown

ChatGPT
ChatGPT
May 6, 2026
Rank
#7
AI Index
83.0
Mention Rate
83.0%
gemini
gemini
May 6, 2026
Rank
#8
AI Index
86.0
Mention Rate
85.0%
Grok
Grok
May 6, 2026
Rank
#10
AI Index
77.0
Mention Rate
75.0%
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
May 6, 2026
Rank
#7
AI Index
80.9
Mention Rate
80.0%
MiniMax
MiniMax
May 6, 2026
Rank
#5
AI Index
84.0
Mention Rate
83.0%
Kimi
Kimi
May 6, 2026
Rank
#8
AI Index
80.8
Mention Rate
79.0%

Comparable Entities

Zhaopin is the closest comparable entity by rank, with FlexJobs behind it by 1.5 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is FlexJobs ranked in the Job Platforms leaderboard?

FlexJobs is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Job Platforms prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for FlexJobs?

The strongest current signal is gemini at 86 AI Index and 85% mention rate. The softest covered signal is Grok at 77 AI Index and 75% mention rate.

Which entities should be compared with FlexJobs?

The most useful nearby comparison is Zhaopin. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.

How often is this page updated?

This page updates when a new completed Job Platforms leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-05-06.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 6 tracked AI engines and the latest completed category leaderboard run for Job Platforms.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.