Back to Job Platforms leaderboard

Entity Page · Category · Job Platforms

Zhaopin AI Visibility in Job Platforms

Zhaopin ranks #6 in the Job Platforms leaderboard with a 83.4 AI Index across 6 engines. Its strongest current signal comes from Grok, and the score should be read as AI visibility rather than product quality, adoption, revenue, or market share.

Entity Score
83
Leaderboard rank #6 of 21
Category Rank
#6
Engines Covered
6
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
May 6, 2026

Entity Snapshot

Zhaopin is currently #6 out of 21 entities in Job Platforms, with a 83.4 overall AI visibility score across 6 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering category comparison and recommendation prompts.

Zhaopin is currently #6 out of 21 Job Platforms entities, with a 83.4 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Zhaopin trails Glassdoor by 2.1 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from Grok, where Zhaopin records a 85.5 AI Index and 85% mention rate. DeepSeek is the next strongest covered engine at 84.6 with a 84% mention rate.

The softer engine-level signal is MiniMax, where Zhaopin records a 79.7 AI Index and 80% mention rate. Kimi is another engine to watch at 82.8 with a 84% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Zhaopin in Job Platforms category prompts. It does not rank product quality, security, reliability, compliance, sales, or real-world usage.

Zhaopin's strongest current visibility comes from Grok (85.5 AI Index, 85% mention rate) and DeepSeek (84.6 AI Index, 84% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is MiniMax (79.7 AI Index, 80% mention rate) and Kimi (82.9 AI Index, 84% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Zhaopin or a competitor set.

Compare in Trend Explorer

Zhaopin has limited historical movement in the current public payload. Use the latest AI Index, engine coverage, and mention-rate signals as the primary read until more completed runs are available.

Zhaopin has limited historical data so far. More runs will make the trend more reliable.

Zhaopin has limited historical data so far. More runs will make the trend more reliable.

Engine Breakdown

ChatGPT
ChatGPT
May 6, 2026
Rank
#5
AI Index
84.0
Mention Rate
85.0%
gemini
gemini
May 6, 2026
Rank
#9
AI Index
83.9
Mention Rate
84.0%
Grok
Grok
May 6, 2026
Rank
#6
AI Index
85.5
Mention Rate
85.0%
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
May 6, 2026
Rank
#6
AI Index
84.6
Mention Rate
84.0%
MiniMax
MiniMax
May 6, 2026
Rank
#8
AI Index
79.7
Mention Rate
80.0%
Kimi
Kimi
May 6, 2026
Rank
#6
AI Index
82.8
Mention Rate
84.0%

Comparable Entities

Glassdoor is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Zhaopin behind it by 2.1 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is Zhaopin ranked in the Job Platforms leaderboard?

Zhaopin is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Job Platforms prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for Zhaopin?

The strongest current signal is Grok at 85.5 AI Index and 85% mention rate. The softest covered signal is MiniMax at 79.7 AI Index and 80% mention rate.

Which entities should be compared with Zhaopin?

The most useful nearby comparison is Glassdoor. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.

How often is this page updated?

This page updates when a new completed Job Platforms leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-05-06.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 6 tracked AI engines and the latest completed category leaderboard run for Job Platforms.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.