AI Visibility Leaderboard
Messaging Apps AI Brand Rankings
Messaging Apps publishes 27 ranked brands from the accepted leaderboard snapshot. WhatsApp is rank 1 with composite index 93.01.
Brand rankings
| Rank | Brand | Visibility score | AI engine summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 93.01 | Rank 1 in Messaging Apps with composite index 93.01; mention rate 100 | |
| 2 | Telegram | 73.88 | Rank 2 in Messaging Apps with composite index 73.88; mention rate 94.64 |
| 3 | Signal | 61.35 | Rank 3 in Messaging Apps with composite index 61.35; mention rate 67.86 |
| 4 | Discord | 48.18 | Rank 4 in Messaging Apps with composite index 48.18; mention rate 51.79 |
| 5 | Messenger | 45.01 | Rank 5 in Messaging Apps with composite index 45.01; mention rate 51.79 |
| 6 | 40.83 | Rank 6 in Messaging Apps with composite index 40.83; mention rate 35.71 | |
| 7 | iMessage | 38.86 | Rank 7 in Messaging Apps with composite index 38.86; mention rate 44.64 |
| 8 | LINE | 30.57 | Rank 8 in Messaging Apps with composite index 30.57; mention rate 21.43 |
| 9 | Snapchat | 28.41 | Rank 9 in Messaging Apps with composite index 28.41; mention rate 10.72 |
| 10 | Viber | 26.7 | Rank 10 in Messaging Apps with composite index 26.7; mention rate 8.93 |
| 11 | KakaoTalk | 20.84 | Rank 11 in Messaging Apps with composite index 20.84; mention rate 1.79 |
| 12 | Zoom | 18.25 | Rank 12 in Messaging Apps with composite index 18.25; mention rate 0 |
| 13 | Microsoft Teams | 18.05 | Rank 13 in Messaging Apps with composite index 18.05; mention rate 3.57 |
| 14 | Google Messages | 17.14 | Rank 14 in Messaging Apps with composite index 17.14; mention rate 0 |
| 15 | Skype | 15.5 | Rank 15 in Messaging Apps with composite index 15.5; mention rate 0 |
| 16 | 15 | Rank 16 in Messaging Apps with composite index 15; mention rate 0 | |
| 17 | Slack | 14.41 | Rank 17 in Messaging Apps with composite index 14.41; mention rate 7.14 |
| 18 | imo | 12.5 | Rank 18 in Messaging Apps with composite index 12.5; mention rate 0 |
| 19 | Zalo | 12.33 | Rank 19 in Messaging Apps with composite index 12.33; mention rate 0 |
| 20 | Threema | 12.18 | Rank 20 in Messaging Apps with composite index 12.18; mention rate 3.57 |
| 21 | Lark | 11 | Rank 21 in Messaging Apps with composite index 11; mention rate 0 |
| 22 | Google Chat | 10.75 | Rank 22 in Messaging Apps with composite index 10.75; mention rate 0 |
| 23 | Element | 9.24 | Rank 23 in Messaging Apps with composite index 9.24; mention rate 2.04 |
| 24 | Kik | 8 | Rank 24 in Messaging Apps with composite index 8; mention rate 0 |
| 25 | GroupMe | 7.4 | Rank 25 in Messaging Apps with composite index 7.4; mention rate 0 |
Methodology FAQ
How is the Messaging Apps leaderboard calculated?
Overall ranking combines the latest AI visibility signals across tracked engines for Messaging Apps, including rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate patterns.
Why can WhatsApp lead overall but differ by engine?
Each AI engine can prefer different brands, evidence, freshness, and recommendation patterns, so engine-specific rankings can diverge from the combined leaderboard.
How often is this Messaging Apps leaderboard updated?
This leaderboard updates whenever new completed runs are available for Messaging Apps, with the latest refresh date shown on the page.
How to read this page
This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.
Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.