Back to Messaging Apps leaderboard

Entity Page · Category · Messaging Apps

Telegram AI Visibility in Messaging Apps

Telegram ranks #2 in the Messaging Apps leaderboard with a 92.6 AI Index across 5 engines. Its strongest current signal comes from gemini, and the score should be read as AI visibility rather than product quality, adoption, revenue, or market share.

Entity Score
93
Leaderboard rank #2 of 20
Category Rank
#2
Engines Covered
5
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
Apr 29, 2026

Entity Snapshot

Telegram is currently #2 out of 20 entities in Messaging Apps, with a 92.6 overall AI visibility score across 5 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering category comparison and recommendation prompts.

Telegram is currently #2 out of 20 Messaging Apps entities, with a 92.6 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Telegram trails WhatsApp by 3 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from gemini, where Telegram records a 96.1 AI Index and 96% mention rate. Grok is the next strongest covered engine at 94.3 with a 94% mention rate.

The softer engine-level signal is ChatGPT, where Telegram records a 90.1 AI Index and 89% mention rate. DeepSeek is another engine to watch at 90.8 with a 90% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Telegram in Messaging Apps category prompts. It does not rank product quality, security, reliability, compliance, sales, or real-world usage.

Telegram's strongest current visibility comes from gemini (96.1 AI Index, 96% mention rate) and Grok (94.4 AI Index, 94% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is ChatGPT (90.1 AI Index, 89% mention rate) and DeepSeek (90.9 AI Index, 90% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Telegram or a competitor set.

Compare in Trend Explorer

Telegram has limited historical movement in the current public payload. Use the latest AI Index, engine coverage, and mention-rate signals as the primary read until more completed runs are available.

Telegram has limited historical data so far. More runs will make the trend more reliable.

Telegram has limited historical data so far. More runs will make the trend more reliable.

Engine Breakdown

ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Apr 29, 2026
Rank
#2
AI Index
90.1
Mention Rate
89.0%
gemini
gemini
Apr 29, 2026
Rank
#2
AI Index
96.1
Mention Rate
96.0%
Grok
Grok
Apr 29, 2026
Rank
#3
AI Index
94.3
Mention Rate
94.0%
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
Apr 29, 2026
Rank
#4
AI Index
90.8
Mention Rate
90.0%
Kimi
Kimi
Apr 29, 2026
Rank
#2
AI Index
91.8
Mention Rate
92.0%

Comparable Entities

WhatsApp is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Telegram behind it by 3 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is Telegram ranked in the Messaging Apps leaderboard?

Telegram is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Messaging Apps prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for Telegram?

The strongest current signal is gemini at 96.1 AI Index and 96% mention rate. The softest covered signal is ChatGPT at 90.1 AI Index and 89% mention rate.

Which entities should be compared with Telegram?

The most useful nearby comparison is WhatsApp. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.

How often is this page updated?

This page updates when a new completed Messaging Apps leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-04-29.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 5 tracked AI engines and the latest completed category leaderboard run for Messaging Apps.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.