AI Visibility Leaderboard

Online Whiteboard Software AI Brand Rankings

Online Whiteboard Software publishes 6 ranked brands from the accepted leaderboard snapshot. Miro is rank 1 with composite index 92.16.

Brand rankings

RankBrandVisibility scoreAI engine summary
1Miro92.16Rank 1 in Online Whiteboard Software with composite index 92.16; mention rate 92.6
2Mural88.6Rank 2 in Online Whiteboard Software with composite index 88.6; mention rate 88.6
3FigJam88.28Rank 3 in Online Whiteboard Software with composite index 88.28; mention rate 87.4
4Lucidspark86.03Rank 4 in Online Whiteboard Software with composite index 86.03; mention rate 85.4
5Microsoft Whiteboard79.81Rank 5 in Online Whiteboard Software with composite index 79.81; mention rate 79.2
6Zoom Whiteboard75.99Rank 6 in Online Whiteboard Software with composite index 75.99; mention rate 74.6

Methodology FAQ

How is the Online Whiteboard Software leaderboard calculated?

Overall ranking combines the latest AI visibility signals across tracked engines for Online Whiteboard Software, including rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate patterns.

Why can Miro lead overall but differ by engine?

Each AI engine can prefer different brands, evidence, freshness, and recommendation patterns, so engine-specific rankings can diverge from the combined leaderboard.

How often is this Online Whiteboard Software leaderboard updated?

This leaderboard updates whenever new completed runs are available for Online Whiteboard Software, with the latest refresh date shown on the page.

How to read this page

This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.

Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.