Back to Outdoor Apparel leaderboard

Entity Page · Industry · Outdoor Apparel

Outdoor Research AI Visibility in Outdoor Apparel

Outdoor Research currently ranks #11 in the Outdoor Apparel leaderboard with an overall AI visibility score of 25.7 across 5 tracked engines. Its strongest recent performance appears in gemini with a 39.9 AI Index, which makes that engine the clearest source of current recommendation strength.

Entity Score
26
Leaderboard rank #11 of 30
Industry Rank
#11
Engines Covered
5
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
May 26, 2026

Entity Snapshot

Outdoor Research is currently #11 out of 30 entities in Outdoor Apparel, with a 25.7 overall AI visibility score across 5 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering industry comparison and recommendation prompts.

Strongest visibility currently comes from gemini (39.9 AI Index, 57.1% mention rate) and Kimi (28.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate). These engines provide the best evidence that the brand is being selected consistently when AI systems answer this category.

Visibility is relatively weaker in MiniMax (14.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate) and Qwen (19.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate). Those lower-scoring engines are the main places to investigate if recommendation consistency needs to improve.

Outdoor Research's strongest current visibility comes from gemini (39.9 AI Index, 57.1% mention rate) and Kimi (28.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is MiniMax (14.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate) and Qwen (19.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Outdoor Research or a competitor set.

Compare in Trend Explorer

Outdoor Research has softened in recent runs, moving from 37.2 to 26.8 for a -10.4 point change. The weaker engines are the first places to inspect.

Outdoor Research softened over the visible trend window, moving from 37.2 on 2026-04-29 to 26.8 on 2026-05-26. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.

Outdoor Research softened over the visible trend window, moving from 37.2 on 2026-04-29 to 26.8 on 2026-05-26. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.

Engine Breakdown

gemini
gemini
May 26, 2026
Rank
#9
AI Index
39.9
Mention Rate
57.1%
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
May 26, 2026
Rank
#11
AI Index
25.7
Mention Rate
14.3%
MiniMax
MiniMax
May 26, 2026
Rank
#15
AI Index
14.7
Mention Rate
14.3%
Qwen
Qwen
May 24, 2026
Rank
#14
AI Index
19.7
Mention Rate
14.3%
Kimi
Kimi
May 24, 2026
Rank
#9
AI Index
28.7
Mention Rate
14.3%

Comparable Entities

Salomon is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Outdoor Research behind it by 0.8 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is Outdoor Research ranked in the Outdoor Apparel leaderboard?

Outdoor Research is ranked using its current overall AI visibility score across tracked engines in Outdoor Apparel, combining rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for Outdoor Research?

The latest engine breakdown shows the strongest visibility in gemini and relatively weaker visibility in MiniMax.

Which entities should be compared with Outdoor Research?

Outdoor Research is compared most directly with Salomon, Norrøna, and Marmot in the current Outdoor Apparel leaderboard.

How often is this page updated?

The page updates whenever new completed leaderboard runs are available for this industry.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 5 tracked AI engines and the latest completed industry leaderboard run for Outdoor Apparel.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.