AI Visibility Leaderboard
Personal Care Appliances AI Brand Rankings
Personal Care Appliances publishes 27 ranked brands from the accepted leaderboard snapshot. Braun is rank 1 with composite index 84.67.
Brand rankings
| Rank | Brand | Visibility score | AI engine summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Braun | 84.67 | Rank 1 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 84.67; mention rate 98.21 |
| 2 | Philips | 78.48 | Rank 2 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 78.48; mention rate 100 |
| 3 | Panasonic | 67.79 | Rank 3 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 67.79; mention rate 92.86 |
| 4 | Dyson | 59.93 | Rank 4 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 59.93; mention rate 51.78 |
| 5 | Remington | 44.96 | Rank 5 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 44.96; mention rate 62.5 |
| 6 | Wahl | 44.95 | Rank 6 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 44.95; mention rate 57.14 |
| 7 | Oral-B | 32.47 | Rank 7 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 32.47; mention rate 26.53 |
| 8 | Conair | 28.27 | Rank 8 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 28.27; mention rate 17.86 |
| 9 | ghd | 25.17 | Rank 9 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 25.17; mention rate 16.67 |
| 10 | BaByliss | 25 | Rank 10 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 25; mention rate 12.5 |
| 11 | Philips Sonicare | 23 | Rank 11 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 23; mention rate 0 |
| 12 | T3 | 20.6 | Rank 12 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 20.6; mention rate 11.91 |
| 13 | Shark | 20.07 | Rank 13 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 20.07; mention rate 4.76 |
| 14 | Revlon | 18.43 | Rank 14 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 18.43; mention rate 0 |
| 15 | Waterpik | 17.94 | Rank 15 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 17.94; mention rate 2.86 |
| 16 | Xiaomi | 17.33 | Rank 16 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 17.33; mention rate 0 |
| 17 | Rowenta | 16.25 | Rank 17 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 16.25; mention rate 0 |
| 18 | CHI | 15 | Rank 18 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 15; mention rate 0 |
| 19 | Andis | 13.43 | Rank 19 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 13.43; mention rate 0 |
| 20 | Foreo | 13.25 | Rank 20 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 13.25; mention rate 0 |
| 21 | Hot Tools | 12.57 | Rank 21 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 12.57; mention rate 0 |
| 22 | NuFACE | 9.5 | Rank 22 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 9.5; mention rate 0 |
| 23 | FLYCO | 9 | Rank 23 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 9; mention rate 0 |
| 24 | Manscaped | 8.36 | Rank 24 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 8.36; mention rate 7.15 |
| 25 | HoMedics | 8 | Rank 25 in Personal Care Appliances with composite index 8; mention rate 0 |
Methodology FAQ
How is the Personal Care Appliances leaderboard calculated?
Overall ranking combines the latest AI visibility signals across tracked engines for Personal Care Appliances, including rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate patterns.
Why can Braun lead overall but differ by engine?
Each AI engine can prefer different brands, evidence, freshness, and recommendation patterns, so engine-specific rankings can diverge from the combined leaderboard.
How often is this Personal Care Appliances leaderboard updated?
This leaderboard updates whenever new completed runs are available for Personal Care Appliances, with the latest refresh date shown on the page.
How to read this page
This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.
Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.