Entity Page · Industry · Second-hand Marketplaces
Vestiaire Collective AI Visibility in Second-hand Marketplaces
Vestiaire Collective ranks #6 in the Second-hand Marketplaces leaderboard with a 39 AI Index across 7 engines with current brand-level data. Its strongest current signal comes from Kimi, and the score should be read as AI visibility rather than market share or product quality.
Entity Snapshot
Vestiaire Collective is currently #4 out of 30 entities in Second-hand Marketplaces, with a 46.2 overall AI visibility score across 6 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering industry comparison and recommendation prompts.
Vestiaire Collective is currently #6 out of 30 tracked Second-hand Marketplaces entities, with a 39 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Vestiaire Collective trails Vinted by 0.1 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from Kimi, where Vestiaire Collective records a 69 AI Index and 85.7% mention rate. MiniMax is the next strongest covered engine at 47.9 with a 57.1% mention rate.
The softer engine-level signal is DeepSeek, where Vestiaire Collective records a 22 AI Index and 0% mention rate. Grok is another engine to watch at 25.7 with a 14.3% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Vestiaire Collective in Second-hand Marketplaces prompts. It does not rank product quality, sales, safety, or real-world market share.
Vestiaire Collective's strongest current visibility comes from DeepSeek (62.9 AI Index, 28.6% mention rate) and Kimi (56.6 AI Index, 71.4% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is MiniMax (23.8 AI Index, 42.9% mention rate) and Qwen (34.5 AI Index, 42.9% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.
Continue from Here
This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Vestiaire Collective or a competitor set.
Entity Trend
Open trend explorerVestiaire Collective's latest visible AI Index is 39. Read the trend together with engine coverage and mention-rate signals rather than as a standalone forecast. That movement is useful context, but it is strongest when it lines up with engine coverage and mention-rate changes. A single score move should not be read as a full market or product signal.
Vestiaire Collective improved over the visible trend window, moving from 35.7 on 2026-04-30 to 46.5 on 2026-05-31. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.
Engine Breakdown
Comparable Entities
The RealReal is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Vestiaire Collective behind it by 3.6 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.
FAQ
Why is Vestiaire Collective ranked in the Second-hand Marketplaces leaderboard?
Vestiaire Collective is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Second-hand Marketplaces prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.
Which engines are strongest and weakest for Vestiaire Collective?
The strongest current signal is Kimi at 69 AI Index and 85.7% mention rate. The softest covered signal is DeepSeek at 22 AI Index and 0% mention rate.
Which entities should be compared with Vestiaire Collective?
The most useful nearby comparison is Vinted. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.
How often is this page updated?
This page updates when a new completed Second-hand Marketplaces leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-05-10.
Methodology and source context
AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 6 tracked AI engines and the latest completed industry leaderboard run for Second-hand Marketplaces.
Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.