AI Visibility Leaderboard

Supply Chain Management Software AI Brand Rankings

Supply Chain Management Software publishes 6 ranked brands from the accepted leaderboard snapshot. Kinaxis Maestro is rank 1 with composite index 92.

Brand rankings

RankBrandVisibility scoreAI engine summary
1Kinaxis Maestro92Rank 1 in Supply Chain Management Software with composite index 92; mention rate 92
2Blue Yonder Supply Chain Management90.43Rank 2 in Supply Chain Management Software with composite index 90.43; mention rate 90.5
3SAP Integrated Business Planning90.03Rank 3 in Supply Chain Management Software with composite index 90.03; mention rate 89.5
4Oracle Fusion Cloud SCM89.83Rank 4 in Supply Chain Management Software with composite index 89.83; mention rate 90
5e2open Connected Supply Chain87.98Rank 5 in Supply Chain Management Software with composite index 87.98; mention rate 87.5
6Infor Nexus86.05Rank 6 in Supply Chain Management Software with composite index 86.05; mention rate 85

Methodology FAQ

How is the Supply Chain Management Software leaderboard calculated?

Overall ranking combines the latest AI visibility signals across tracked engines for Supply Chain Management Software, including rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate patterns.

Why can Kinaxis Maestro lead overall but differ by engine?

Each AI engine can prefer different brands, evidence, freshness, and recommendation patterns, so engine-specific rankings can diverge from the combined leaderboard.

How often is this Supply Chain Management Software leaderboard updated?

This leaderboard updates whenever new completed runs are available for Supply Chain Management Software, with the latest refresh date shown on the page.

How to read this page

This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.

Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.