AI Visibility Leaderboard
Team Collaboration Software AI Brand Rankings
Team Collaboration Software publishes 7 ranked brands from the accepted leaderboard snapshot. Slack is rank 1 with composite index 92.35.
Brand rankings
| Rank | Brand | Visibility score | AI engine summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Slack | 92.35 | Rank 1 in Team Collaboration Software with composite index 92.35; mention rate 92 |
| 2 | Microsoft Teams | 90.94 | Rank 2 in Team Collaboration Software with composite index 90.94; mention rate 92.4 |
| 3 | Google Workspace | 87.86 | Rank 3 in Team Collaboration Software with composite index 87.86; mention rate 87.8 |
| 4 | Mattermost | 79.75 | Rank 4 in Team Collaboration Software with composite index 79.75; mention rate 78.2 |
| 5 | Basecamp | 76.61 | Rank 5 in Team Collaboration Software with composite index 76.61; mention rate 73.6 |
| 6 | Twist | 76.39 | Rank 6 in Team Collaboration Software with composite index 76.39; mention rate 73.4 |
| 7 | Flock | 71.97 | Rank 7 in Team Collaboration Software with composite index 71.97; mention rate 69 |
Methodology FAQ
How is the Team Collaboration Software leaderboard calculated?
Overall ranking combines the latest AI visibility signals across tracked engines for Team Collaboration Software, including rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate patterns.
Why can Slack lead overall but differ by engine?
Each AI engine can prefer different brands, evidence, freshness, and recommendation patterns, so engine-specific rankings can diverge from the combined leaderboard.
How often is this Team Collaboration Software leaderboard updated?
This leaderboard updates whenever new completed runs are available for Team Collaboration Software, with the latest refresh date shown on the page.
How to read this page
This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.
Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.