AI Visibility Leaderboard
Microsoft Teams AI Visibility in Video Conferencing Software
Microsoft Teams AI Visibility in Video Conferencing Software is based on the latest accepted public leaderboard evidence.
Rank, score, engine coverage, and nearby competitors are rendered from the same accepted leaderboard data used by the public page.
Microsoft Teams visibility profile
- Current rank
- 2
- Visibility score
- 91.41
- Collection
- Video Conferencing Software
Microsoft Teams is rank 2 in Video Conferencing Software with composite index 91.41.
Closest competitors
| Brand | Rank | Visibility score | AI engine note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zoom Workplace | 1 | 93.6 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Google Meet | 3 | 89.73 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Cisco Webex | 4 | 88.98 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Pexip | 5 | 81.42 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| RingCentral Video | 6 | 81.28 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| GoTo Meeting | 7 | 80.78 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Slack Huddles | 8 | 78.57 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Dialpad Meetings | 9 | 78.32 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| Jitsi Meet | 10 | 77.34 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
| BigBlueButton | 11 | 76.65 | Compared across the latest accepted AI visibility evidence |
How to read this page
This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.
Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.