AI Visibility Leaderboard
Luxury Fashion AI Brand Rankings
Luxury Fashion publishes 29 ranked brands from the accepted leaderboard snapshot. Hermès is rank 1 with composite index 81.62.
Brand rankings
| Rank | Brand | Visibility score | AI engine summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hermès | 81.62 | Rank 1 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 81.62; mention rate 71.43 |
| 2 | Chanel | 70.53 | Rank 2 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 70.53; mention rate 58.93 |
| 3 | Gucci | 64.82 | Rank 3 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 64.82; mention rate 62.5 |
| 4 | Dior | 54.32 | Rank 4 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 54.32; mention rate 55.36 |
| 5 | Louis Vuitton | 53.41 | Rank 5 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 53.41; mention rate 64.29 |
| 6 | Prada | 50.24 | Rank 6 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 50.24; mention rate 41.07 |
| 7 | Saint Laurent | 32.12 | Rank 7 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 32.12; mention rate 25 |
| 8 | Cartier | 30.24 | Rank 8 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 30.24; mention rate 33.93 |
| 9 | Balenciaga | 29.52 | Rank 9 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 29.52; mention rate 17.86 |
| 10 | Bottega Veneta | 27.71 | Rank 10 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 27.71; mention rate 26.79 |
| 11 | Burberry | 26.11 | Rank 11 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 26.11; mention rate 7.15 |
| 12 | Fendi | 23.61 | Rank 12 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 23.61; mention rate 7.15 |
| 13 | Loro Piana | 22.32 | Rank 13 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 22.32; mention rate 24.49 |
| 14 | Valentino | 20.55 | Rank 14 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 20.55; mention rate 3.57 |
| 15 | Versace | 19.95 | Rank 15 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 19.95; mention rate 8.93 |
| 16 | Celine | 19.04 | Rank 16 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 19.04; mention rate 12.25 |
| 17 | Giorgio Armani | 18.64 | Rank 17 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 18.64; mention rate 5.36 |
| 18 | Loewe | 17.75 | Rank 18 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 17.75; mention rate 8.93 |
| 19 | Rolex | 17.17 | Rank 19 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 17.17; mention rate 11.43 |
| 20 | Givenchy | 15.96 | Rank 20 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 15.96; mention rate 1.79 |
| 21 | Dolce & Gabbana | 15.57 | Rank 21 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 15.57; mention rate 0 |
| 22 | Tiffany & Co. | 14.67 | Rank 22 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 14.67; mention rate 0 |
| 23 | Bulgari | 11.9 | Rank 23 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 11.9; mention rate 4.76 |
| 24 | Alexander McQueen | 11.67 | Rank 24 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 11.67; mention rate 2.04 |
| 25 | Moncler | 11.07 | Rank 25 in Luxury Fashion with composite index 11.07; mention rate 4.76 |
Methodology FAQ
How is the Luxury Fashion leaderboard calculated?
Overall ranking combines the latest AI visibility signals across tracked engines for Luxury Fashion, including rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate patterns.
Why can Hermès lead overall but differ by engine?
Each AI engine can prefer different brands, evidence, freshness, and recommendation patterns, so engine-specific rankings can diverge from the combined leaderboard.
How often is this Luxury Fashion leaderboard updated?
This leaderboard updates whenever new completed runs are available for Luxury Fashion, with the latest refresh date shown on the page.
How to read this page
This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.
Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.