Back to Messaging Apps leaderboard

Entity Page · Industry · Messaging Apps

Lark AI Visibility in Messaging Apps

Lark ranks #16 in the Messaging Apps leaderboard with a 14.5 AI Index across 2 engines with current brand-level data. Its strongest current signal comes from DeepSeek, and the score should be read as AI visibility rather than market share or product quality.

Entity Score
7
Leaderboard rank #25 of 29
Industry Rank
#25
Engines Covered
3
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
May 31, 2026

Entity Snapshot

Lark is currently #25 out of 29 entities in Messaging Apps, with a 7.5 overall AI visibility score across 3 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering industry comparison and recommendation prompts.

Lark is currently #16 out of 30 tracked Messaging Apps entities, with a 14.5 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Lark trails Slack by 2.8 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from DeepSeek, where Lark records a 20 AI Index and 0% mention rate. Grok is the next strongest covered engine at 9 with a 0% mention rate.

The softer engine-level signal is Grok, where Lark records a 9 AI Index and 0% mention rate. DeepSeek is another engine to watch at 20 with a 0% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Lark in Messaging Apps prompts. It does not rank product quality, sales, safety, or real-world market share.

Lark's strongest current visibility comes from Kimi (11 AI Index, 0% mention rate) and DeepSeek (5.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is DeepSeek (5.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate) and MiniMax (5.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Lark or a competitor set.

Compare in Trend Explorer

Lark's latest visible AI Index is 14.5. Read the trend together with engine coverage and mention-rate signals rather than as a standalone forecast. That movement is useful context, but it is strongest when it lines up with engine coverage and mention-rate changes. A single score move should not be read as a full market or product signal.

Lark softened over the visible trend window, moving from 17 on 2026-05-01 to 5.7 on 2026-05-31. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.

Lark softened over the visible trend window, moving from 17 on 2026-05-01 to 5.7 on 2026-05-31. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.

Engine Breakdown

DeepSeek
DeepSeek
May 31, 2026
Rank
#9
AI Index
5.7
Mention Rate
14.3%
MiniMax
MiniMax
May 31, 2026
Rank
#21
AI Index
5.7
Mention Rate
14.3%
Kimi
Kimi
May 24, 2026
Rank
#21
AI Index
11.0
Mention Rate
0.0%

Comparable Entities

Kik is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Lark behind it by 1 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is Lark ranked in the Messaging Apps leaderboard?

Lark is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Messaging Apps prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for Lark?

The strongest current signal is DeepSeek at 20 AI Index and 0% mention rate. The softest covered signal is Grok at 9 AI Index and 0% mention rate.

Which entities should be compared with Lark?

The most useful nearby comparison is Slack. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.

How often is this page updated?

This page updates when a new completed Messaging Apps leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-05-10.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 3 tracked AI engines and the latest completed industry leaderboard run for Messaging Apps.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.