AI Visibility Profile · Industry · Personal Care

Clear AI Visibility in Personal Care

Clear ranks #27 of 30 in the Personal Care AI visibility leaderboard with a 5 AI Index across 3 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.

Entity Score
5
Leaderboard rank #27 of 30

AI visibility answer

How Clear appears in AI search

Clear currently ranks #27 out of 30 in the Personal Care AI visibility leaderboard with a 5 AI Index across 3 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for Clear AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.

The engine breakdown compares how Grok, ChatGPT, and Kimi rank or mention Clear, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.

Industry Rank
#27
Engines Covered
3
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
Jun 10, 2026

Entity Snapshot

Clear is currently #27 out of 30 entities in Personal Care, with a 5 overall AI visibility score across 3 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering industry comparison and recommendation prompts.

Clear is currently #30 out of 30 tracked Personal Care entities, with a 4 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Clear trails TRESemmé by 3.3 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from Grok, where Clear records a 4 AI Index and 0% mention rate.

The softer engine-level signal is Grok, where Clear records a 4 AI Index and 0% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Clear in Personal Care prompts. It does not rank product quality, sales, safety, or real-world market share.

Clear's strongest current visibility comes from ChatGPT (8 AI Index, 0% mention rate) and Kimi (5 AI Index, 0% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is Grok (2 AI Index, 0% mention rate) and Kimi (5 AI Index, 0% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.

Next Step

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Clear or a competitor set.

Clear ranking history

Clear's latest visible AI Index is 4. Read the trend together with engine coverage and mention-rate signals rather than as a standalone forecast. That movement is useful context, but it is strongest when it lines up with engine coverage and mention-rate changes. A single score move should not be read as a full market or product signal.

Trend data will appear after more completed runs are collected.

Engine Breakdown

Rank
#24
AI Index
2.0
Mention Rate
0.0%
Rank
#13
AI Index
8.0
Mention Rate
0.0%
Rank
#24
AI Index
5.0
Mention Rate
0.0%

Comparable Entities

TRESemmé is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Clear behind it by 2 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is Clear ranked in the Personal Care leaderboard?

Clear is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Personal Care prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for Clear?

The strongest current signal is Grok at 4 AI Index and 0% mention rate. The softest covered signal is Grok at 4 AI Index and 0% mention rate.

Which entities should be compared with Clear?

The most useful nearby comparison is TRESemmé. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.

How often is this page updated?

This page updates when a new completed Personal Care leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-05-09.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 3 tracked AI engines and the latest completed industry leaderboard run for Personal Care.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.