AI Visibility Profile · Category · Project Management Platforms
Teamwork.com AI Visibility in Project Management Platforms
Teamwork.com ranks #8 of 20 in the Project Management Platforms AI visibility leaderboard with a 85.4 AI Index across 6 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.
AI visibility answer
How Teamwork.com appears in AI search
Teamwork.com currently ranks #8 out of 20 in the Project Management Platforms AI visibility leaderboard with a 85.4 AI Index across 6 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for Teamwork.com AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.
The engine breakdown compares how Grok, ChatGPT, and Gemini rank or mention Teamwork.com, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.
Entity Snapshot
Teamwork.com is currently #8 out of 20 entities in Project Management Platforms, with a 85.4 overall AI visibility score across 6 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering category comparison and recommendation prompts.
Teamwork.com is currently #8 out of 20 Project Management Platforms entities, with a 86 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Teamwork.com trails ClickUp by 2.3 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from Grok, where Teamwork.com records a 89.2 AI Index and 89% mention rate. gemini is the next strongest covered engine at 86.2 with a 86% mention rate.
The softer engine-level signal is ChatGPT, where Teamwork.com records a 83.2 AI Index and 83% mention rate. DeepSeek is another engine to watch at 85.3 with a 84% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Teamwork.com in Project Management Platforms category prompts. It does not rank product quality, security, reliability, compliance, sales, or real-world usage.
Teamwork.com's strongest current visibility comes from Grok (89.2 AI Index, 89% mention rate) and Gemini (86.2 AI Index, 86% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is Claude (82.7 AI Index, 82% mention rate) and ChatGPT (83.2 AI Index, 83% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.
Next Step
Continue from Here
This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Teamwork.com or a competitor set.
Entity Trend
Teamwork.com AI visibility trendTeamwork.com has limited historical movement in the current public payload. Use the latest AI Index, engine coverage, and mention-rate signals as the primary read until more completed runs are available.
Engine Breakdown
Comparable Entities
ClickUp is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Teamwork.com behind it by 2.6 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.
FAQ
Why is Teamwork.com ranked in the Project Management Platforms leaderboard?
Teamwork.com is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Project Management Platforms prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.
Which engines are strongest and weakest for Teamwork.com?
The strongest current signal is Grok at 89.2 AI Index and 89% mention rate. The softest covered signal is ChatGPT at 83.2 AI Index and 83% mention rate.
Which entities should be compared with Teamwork.com?
The most useful nearby comparison is ClickUp. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.
How often is this page updated?
This page updates when a new completed Project Management Platforms leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-05-06.
Methodology and source context
AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 6 tracked AI engines and the latest completed category leaderboard run for Project Management Platforms.
Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.