AI Visibility Leaderboard
Project Management Platforms AI Brand Rankings
Asana is the current #1 entity in Project Management Platforms, with a 92.1 AI Index and 92.4% mention rate. Within this public leaderboard snapshot, it is the clearest benchmark for how tracked AI systems answer Project Management Platforms comparison prompts. Jira ranks #2 and trails Asana by 0.8 AI Index points. That gap is the first number to check when deciding whether the top of the category is leader-dominated or closely contested. monday.com ranks #3 and completes the current podium. Comparing the top three across individual engine tabs helps separate broad recommendation consistency from single-engine strength. The latest public snapshot refreshed on 2026-05-06, covering 8 engines and 20 entities. Freshness matters because AI recommendations can shift as models, retrieval sources, prompts, and category evidence change.
Project Management Platforms tracks which products are most consistently surfaced by AI answer engines in this category. In the latest public snapshot, Asana, Jira, and monday.com lead the overall ranking across 8 engines. The overall AI Index combines ranking strength and mention-rate signals. Asana ranks #1 with a 92.1 AI Index and 92.4% mention rate, leading Jira by 0.8 points. Use the engine tabs to see where that position comes from. The overall view shows the combined category ranking, while engine-level views show whether a product is broadly visible or depends on strength in only a few answer systems.
The overall ranking gives a fast read on which products AI systems currently surface most often for Project Management Platforms prompts. The engine tabs add the important detail: they show where visibility is broad, uneven, or concentrated in one answer system. Rank alone is not enough. Mention rate, score gaps, refresh date, and engine-level outliers help show whether a product's position looks durable or depends on a narrower set of prompts and engines. Read this page as AI visibility evidence, not as a product-quality, compliance, safety, or market-share ranking.
Project Management Platforms publishes 20 ranked brands from the accepted leaderboard snapshot. Asana is rank 1 with composite index 90.8.
Brand rankings
| Rank | Brand | Visibility score | AI engine summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asana | 90.8 | Rank 1 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 90.8; mention rate 91 |
| 2 | Jira | 89.87 | Rank 2 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 89.87; mention rate 90 |
| 3 | monday.com | 89.31 | Rank 3 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 89.31; mention rate 89.5 |
| 4 | Planview | 88.51 | Rank 4 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 88.51; mention rate 88.5 |
| 5 | Wrike | 88.37 | Rank 5 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 88.37; mention rate 88.33 |
| 6 | Smartsheet | 88.22 | Rank 6 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 88.22; mention rate 87.83 |
| 7 | ClickUp | 88.18 | Rank 7 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 88.18; mention rate 88.67 |
| 8 | Adobe Workfront | 87.9 | Rank 8 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 87.9; mention rate 88 |
| 9 | Microsoft Project | 87.37 | Rank 9 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 87.37; mention rate 86.33 |
| 10 | Teamwork.com | 85.82 | Rank 10 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 85.82; mention rate 85.17 |
| 11 | ProjectManager | 83.83 | Rank 11 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 83.83; mention rate 82.75 |
| 12 | Zoho Projects | 83.65 | Rank 12 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 83.65; mention rate 83 |
| 13 | LiquidPlanner | 83.29 | Rank 13 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 83.29; mention rate 82.25 |
| 14 | Hive | 83.23 | Rank 14 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 83.23; mention rate 82.5 |
| 15 | TeamGantt | 82.43 | Rank 15 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 82.43; mention rate 80 |
| 16 | Nifty | 82.25 | Rank 16 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 82.25; mention rate 81.25 |
| 17 | GanttPRO | 82.09 | Rank 17 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 82.09; mention rate 79.75 |
| 18 | ProofHub | 81.45 | Rank 18 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 81.45; mention rate 80.25 |
| 19 | Trello | 80.27 | Rank 19 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 80.27; mention rate 77.5 |
| 20 | Basecamp | 78.33 | Rank 20 in Project Management Platforms with composite index 78.33; mention rate 75.67 |
Methodology FAQ
How is the Project Management Platforms leaderboard calculated?
Overall ranking combines the latest AI visibility signals across tracked engines for Project Management Platforms, including rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate patterns.
Why can the current leader lead overall but differ by engine?
Each AI engine can prefer different brands, evidence, freshness, and recommendation patterns, so engine-specific rankings can diverge from the combined leaderboard.
How often is this Project Management Platforms leaderboard updated?
This leaderboard updates whenever new completed runs are available for Project Management Platforms, with the latest refresh date shown on the page.
How to read this page
This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.
Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.