AI Visibility Leaderboard
Search Engines AI Brand Rankings
Search Engines is a public AI visibility leaderboard for search engine brands. It helps searchers compare which products AI systems mention, rank, and recommend when answering search engine rankings, AI visibility rankings, search product comparison, and answer-engine recommendation prompts. The ranking should be read together with engine coverage, mention-rate signals, rank gaps, and the latest completed runs. A high rank means the product is visible in tracked AI answers; it does not by itself prove product quality, market share, pricing fit, or customer satisfaction. For SEO and AEO review, this page now makes the search engine ranking and AI visibility rankings intent explicit: compare public ranking evidence first, then use a private AI visibility tracker when you need monitored prompts, owned brands, competitors, and recurring alerting.
Search Engines tracks which search engine brands are most consistently surfaced by AI answer engines for search engine rankings, AI visibility rankings, search product comparison, and answer-engine recommendation prompts. This page is meant to answer search engine ranking and AI visibility rankings intent directly, using AI visibility evidence rather than a generic market-share list. In the current public snapshot, #1 Google Search (97.3 mention-rate signal), #2 Microsoft Bing (90.5 mention-rate signal), #3 Baidu (85.8 mention-rate signal). Use the overall ranking for the combined AI visibility view, then open engine tabs to see whether each product is broadly visible or depends on a smaller set of answer systems.
Search Engines matters because AI answer engines increasingly shape which products buyers discover before they visit a vendor site, review platform, or traditional search result. Public leaderboard data gives a shared benchmark for search engine ranking intent, AI visibility rankings, and how traditional search brands appear in AI answers. The page is intentionally scoped: it explains AI visibility and answer-engine ranking signals. It does not change canonical URLs, robots rules, sitemap inclusion, or underlying ranking data, and it should not be treated as a substitute for product evaluation or private brand monitoring.
Search Engines publishes 19 ranked brands from the accepted leaderboard snapshot. Google Search is rank 1 with composite index 97.46.
Brand rankings
| Rank | Brand | Visibility score | AI engine summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Google Search | 97.46 | Rank 1 in Search Engines with composite index 97.46; mention rate 97.29 |
| 2 | Microsoft Bing | 89.87 | Rank 2 in Search Engines with composite index 89.87; mention rate 89.57 |
| 3 | Baidu | 87.36 | Rank 3 in Search Engines with composite index 87.36; mention rate 86.57 |
| 4 | Yahoo Japan Search | 84.12 | Rank 4 in Search Engines with composite index 84.12; mention rate 83.67 |
| 5 | Yandex Search | 83.64 | Rank 5 in Search Engines with composite index 83.64; mention rate 83 |
| 6 | Naver Search | 82.94 | Rank 6 in Search Engines with composite index 82.94; mention rate 82 |
| 7 | DuckDuckGo | 82.06 | Rank 7 in Search Engines with composite index 82.06; mention rate 81.71 |
| 8 | Kagi | 80.58 | Rank 8 in Search Engines with composite index 80.58; mention rate 79.71 |
| 9 | Startpage | 80.22 | Rank 9 in Search Engines with composite index 80.22; mention rate 79.67 |
| 10 | Sogou | 79.65 | Rank 10 in Search Engines with composite index 79.65; mention rate 79.33 |
| 11 | Daum | 79.15 | Rank 11 in Search Engines with composite index 79.15; mention rate 78.67 |
| 12 | Brave Search | 78.04 | Rank 12 in Search Engines with composite index 78.04; mention rate 77.29 |
| 13 | 360 Search | 77.13 | Rank 13 in Search Engines with composite index 77.13; mention rate 76.67 |
| 14 | Cốc Cốc Search | 76.35 | Rank 14 in Search Engines with composite index 76.35; mention rate 75.67 |
| 15 | Ecosia | 75.66 | Rank 15 in Search Engines with composite index 75.66; mention rate 74.29 |
| 16 | Qwant | 75.65 | Rank 16 in Search Engines with composite index 75.65; mention rate 75.33 |
| 17 | Yahoo Search | 75.46 | Rank 17 in Search Engines with composite index 75.46; mention rate 74.29 |
| 18 | Petal Search | 75.3 | Rank 18 in Search Engines with composite index 75.3; mention rate 75 |
| 19 | Mojeek | 71.6 | Rank 19 in Search Engines with composite index 71.6; mention rate 71 |
Methodology FAQ
What does this Search Engines leaderboard rank?
It ranks search engine brands by public AI visibility signals across tracked answer engines, including ranking position, mention-rate signals, and engine-level coverage.
How should I use the overall ranking?
Use the overall ranking as a quick benchmark for search engine ranking and AI visibility rankings. Then compare engine tabs, rank gaps, and mention signals before deciding whether the visibility is broad or concentrated.
Why can rankings differ by AI engine?
Each AI engine can rely on different retrieval sources, model behavior, prompt interpretation, and evidence weighting, so engine-specific rankings can diverge from the overall view.
When do I need a private tracker instead of this public page?
Use the public page for category benchmarking. Use a private AI visibility tracker when you need monitored prompts, your own brand, competitors, alerts, and repeatable reporting.
How to read this page
This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.
Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.