Back to Search Engines leaderboard

Entity Page · Category · Search Engines

Kagi AI Visibility in Search Engines

Kagi ranks #7 in the Search Engines leaderboard with a 80.6 AI Index across 6 engines. Its strongest current signal comes from Grok, and the score should be read as AI visibility rather than product quality, adoption, revenue, or market share.

Entity Score
81
Leaderboard rank #7 of 19
Category Rank
#7
Engines Covered
6
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
Apr 29, 2026

Entity Snapshot

Kagi is currently #7 out of 19 entities in Search Engines, with a 80.6 overall AI visibility score across 6 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering category comparison and recommendation prompts.

Kagi is currently #7 out of 20 Search Engines entities, with a 80.6 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Kagi trails Naver Search by 0.4 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from Grok, where Kagi records a 90.8 AI Index and 89% mention rate. gemini is the next strongest covered engine at 86.5 with a 86% mention rate.

The softer engine-level signal is MiniMax, where Kagi records a 66.3 AI Index and 65% mention rate. DeepSeek is another engine to watch at 71.9 with a 70% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Kagi in Search Engines category prompts. It does not rank product quality, security, reliability, compliance, sales, or real-world usage.

Kagi's strongest current visibility comes from Grok (90.8 AI Index, 89% mention rate) and gemini (86.5 AI Index, 86% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is MiniMax (66.3 AI Index, 65% mention rate) and DeepSeek (71.9 AI Index, 70% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Kagi or a competitor set.

Compare in Trend Explorer

Kagi has limited historical movement in the current public payload. Use the latest AI Index, engine coverage, and mention-rate signals as the primary read until more completed runs are available.

Kagi has limited historical data so far. More runs will make the trend more reliable.

Kagi has limited historical data so far. More runs will make the trend more reliable.

Engine Breakdown

ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Apr 29, 2026
Rank
#4
AI Index
82.8
Mention Rate
83.0%
gemini
gemini
Apr 29, 2026
Rank
#7
AI Index
86.5
Mention Rate
86.0%
Grok
Grok
Apr 29, 2026
Rank
#3
AI Index
90.8
Mention Rate
89.0%
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
Apr 29, 2026
Rank
#7
AI Index
71.9
Mention Rate
70.0%
MiniMax
MiniMax
Apr 29, 2026
Rank
#10
AI Index
66.3
Mention Rate
65.0%
Kimi
Kimi
Apr 29, 2026
Rank
#4
AI Index
85.3
Mention Rate
85.0%

Comparable Entities

Naver Search is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Kagi behind it by 0.4 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is Kagi ranked in the Search Engines leaderboard?

Kagi is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Search Engines prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for Kagi?

The strongest current signal is Grok at 90.8 AI Index and 89% mention rate. The softest covered signal is MiniMax at 66.3 AI Index and 65% mention rate.

Which entities should be compared with Kagi?

The most useful nearby comparison is Naver Search. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.

How often is this page updated?

This page updates when a new completed Search Engines leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-04-29.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 6 tracked AI engines and the latest completed category leaderboard run for Search Engines.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.