AI Visibility Leaderboard
Smartphones AI Brand Rankings
Smartphones brands such as Samsung, Xiaomi, and Redmi currently lead the category across 8 tracked AI engines. The overall ranking reflects the latest completed runs and helps benchmark which brands AI systems mention most often.
Smartphones recommendations can vary by engine and by prompt context. This leaderboard tracks which brands appear most consistently across 8 major AI engines and highlights where category visibility is concentrated.
AI answer engines increasingly shape how people shortlist Smartphones brands before they ever click through to websites. Tracking this leaderboard helps teams understand category share of voice, spot leaders, and identify where engine-specific optimization may improve visibility.
Smartphones publishes 28 ranked brands from the accepted leaderboard snapshot. Samsung is rank 1 with composite index 78.99.
Brand rankings
| Rank | Brand | Visibility score | AI engine summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Samsung | 78.99 | Rank 1 in Smartphones with composite index 78.99; mention rate 92.86 |
| 2 | Xiaomi | 78.86 | Rank 2 in Smartphones with composite index 78.86; mention rate 82.14 |
| 3 | OnePlus | 55.03 | Rank 3 in Smartphones with composite index 55.03; mention rate 71.43 |
| 4 | Apple | 54.82 | Rank 4 in Smartphones with composite index 54.82; mention rate 23.22 |
| 5 | Motorola | 54.32 | Rank 5 in Smartphones with composite index 54.32; mention rate 78.57 |
| 6 | realme | 51.2 | Rank 6 in Smartphones with composite index 51.2; mention rate 55.36 |
| 7 | 50.27 | Rank 7 in Smartphones with composite index 50.27; mention rate 57.14 | |
| 8 | OPPO | 29.61 | Rank 8 in Smartphones with composite index 29.61; mention rate 7.14 |
| 9 | Huawei | 27.96 | Rank 9 in Smartphones with composite index 27.96; mention rate 1.79 |
| 10 | vivo | 27.18 | Rank 10 in Smartphones with composite index 27.18; mention rate 3.57 |
| 11 | Honor | 24.16 | Rank 11 in Smartphones with composite index 24.16; mention rate 10.71 |
| 12 | Nokia | 23.52 | Rank 12 in Smartphones with composite index 23.52; mention rate 17.86 |
| 13 | POCO | 18.73 | Rank 13 in Smartphones with composite index 18.73; mention rate 19.05 |
| 14 | Nothing | 18.09 | Rank 14 in Smartphones with composite index 18.09; mention rate 14.29 |
| 15 | Sony | 17.43 | Rank 15 in Smartphones with composite index 17.43; mention rate 3.57 |
| 16 | Tecno | 17.18 | Rank 16 in Smartphones with composite index 17.18; mention rate 3.57 |
| 17 | Infinix | 14.84 | Rank 17 in Smartphones with composite index 14.84; mention rate 1.79 |
| 18 | ASUS | 14.63 | Rank 18 in Smartphones with composite index 14.63; mention rate 0 |
| 19 | ZTE | 12.13 | Rank 19 in Smartphones with composite index 12.13; mention rate 0 |
| 20 | Redmi | 11.43 | Rank 20 in Smartphones with composite index 11.43; mention rate 3.57 |
| 21 | itel | 10.75 | Rank 21 in Smartphones with composite index 10.75; mention rate 0 |
| 22 | TCL | 8.24 | Rank 22 in Smartphones with composite index 8.24; mention rate 2.04 |
| 23 | iQOO | 8.18 | Rank 23 in Smartphones with composite index 8.18; mention rate 3.57 |
| 24 | Fairphone | 8.08 | Rank 24 in Smartphones with composite index 8.08; mention rate 5.72 |
| 25 | Meizu | 7.5 | Rank 25 in Smartphones with composite index 7.5; mention rate 0 |
Methodology FAQ
How is this leaderboard calculated?
Overall ranking combines the latest AI visibility signals across tracked engines for this industry.
Why do rankings differ across engines?
Each AI engine can prefer different brands, evidence, and recommendation patterns, so engine-specific rankings can vary.
How often is this industry updated?
This industry page updates whenever new completed leaderboard runs are available.
How to read this page
This page uses the same leaderboard snapshot for its headline, visible metrics, and comparison table. Read rank together with visibility score: rank shows relative position in the current view, while the score records measured AI visibility. Nearby rows provide comparison context. Follow the related leaderboard links to compare the wider set of tracked entities and continue exploring pages based on the same snapshot.
Scores describe the data available for the snapshot date and should be read as a point-in-time comparison, not a permanent rating. Differences between rows show relative visibility within this leaderboard view. A later snapshot can change both rank and score when the underlying evaluations change. The static table keeps the primary comparison readable without requiring interactive controls.